Skip to main content

Book Annotation: Nonfiction

Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife
Author: Mary Roach

Title: Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife

Genre: Nonfiction (Dewey number 129)

Subject: Afterlife, death and paranormal phenomena

Type: Science, Spirituality

Publication Date: 2005

Number of Pages: 295

Geographical Setting: various

Time Period: various



Plot Summary: What happens when we die? This is the fundamental question Roach’s book explores. However, this book is not meant to debunk or prove definitively the existence of an afterlife. From the introduction Roach writes “this is not a debunking book. Skeptics and debunkers provide a needed service in this area, but their work more or less assumes an outcome. I’m trying hard to not to make assumptions, not to have an agenda. Simply put, this is a book for people who would like very much to believe in a soul and in an afterlife for it to hang around in, but who have trouble accepting these things on faith” (14).

The book covers a wide period of time from the early Greek and Hebrew philosophy scholars to the present day. Some of the topics explored include reincarnation, theories on when the soul enters the fetus, experiments to prove the existence of a soul such as weighing a person at the moment of death, ectoplasm and aura photography, spiritualism, medium school, parapsychology, and various ways people try to communicate with the dead.

The book is written humorously and is in the middle of Wyatt’s narrative continuum scale. Most of the book is written factually with little dialogue. The only parts that contain actual dialogue are from the author’s direct experiences. Her tone is witty, sarcastic and dry. Here’s a sample quote: “For three hours and forty minutes, the physicians watched the man fade. In place of the more usual bedside attitudes of grief and pity, the men assumed an air of breathless, intent expectancy. I imagine you see this on the faces of NASA engineers during countdown and, possibly, vultures” (Roach 81).

Top 3 Appeals: Learning/experiencing, tone, story line

28815491Read alikes:

Ghostland: An American History of Haunted Places by Colin Dickey: This book explores some of America’s most haunted locations and the true history behind their most famous ghost stories.




38606864Frankenstein and the Birth of Science: The Era of Ingenuity That Electrified Science and Fiction by Joel Levy: This book explores the science of the time and how it influenced Mary Shelley when she was writing her iconic book Frankenstein.









References:

Roach, Mary. Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife. W.W. Norton & Company, 2005.

Wyatt, Neal. The Reader’s Advisory Guide to Nonfiction. ALA, 2007.

“Read-alikes for Spook”. Novelist, http://web.a.ebscohost.com/novp/detail?sid=d9e05ae9-1123-435c-81f0-2bc203963ded%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&UI=UI+159144&vid=12. Accessed 27 March 2019.

All images taken from Goodreads.

Comments

  1. Yay! A nonfiction choice that isn't a memoir about mental illness! It does sound irreverent and sarcastic (like many of our choices so far, I think?), maybe that will be the overriding tone of this age and when historians look back they will wonder. Maybe they won't wonder, and maybe that will be worse. This book sounds interesting, though--did it come to any surprising conclusions?

    ReplyDelete
  2. There isn't much better than a sarcastic book on life after death! Well maybe a sarcastic book on life before death...:)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am such a fan of Mary Roach's work! I haven't read this title yet, though...but is definitely on my to-read list. I love the way she can make any subject interesting to read about, and humorous. My favorite kind of nonfiction!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Okay this sounds like a book I would enjoy!! Death with humor is always fun mix. I haven’t read any books by Roach before, but I’ll have to check her out!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I LOVE Mary Roach! Tomorrow evening my book club is discussing Gulp by her! She does a great job mixing science and humor and making it into fun and easy non-fiction reads. I love that you included a quote of her writing style. Full points!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book Club Experience

I attended the Harry Potter Book Discussion at one of my library system’s branches. I went in January and February. As the title of the group implies, they discuss the Harry Potter original books and the extended universe. When I attended in January we discussed Harry Potter and The Cursed Child parts 1 & 2 and last month we discussed Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (both the screenplay and the movie). We aren’t meeting in March unfortunately but for April we’ll be discussing Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald and for May we’re branching out to The Magicians by Lev Grossman. Even though I work in a library I have never participated in a book club or book discussion. I have almost zero experience with attending or facilitating a book club. However, I was very pleasantly surprised by this one! I planned to attend the January meeting to satisfy the class requirement but I liked it so much that I went back last month and plan to go to the future meetings. T...

Prompt Response 8

My reaction is to not separate the collections to a different place. Now if the library does have genre fiction stickers I would consider adding a sticker to the books classified as Urban Fiction in our catalog in order to appease patrons who want to find these books easier in the collection. I feel this is fair because Urban Fiction is a recognized genre now the same as Westerns or Mystery. I would not consider doing this with the LGBTQ ficiton. My reasoning is that separating the LGBTQ fiction into its own section could be considered a form of censorship. According to the ALA’s Access to Library Resources and Services Regardless of Sex, Gender Identity, Gender Expression, or Sexual Orientation this could be considered a form of censorship since these books are singled out and put away in a special section. Some other thoughts that come to mind are this is a vulnerable population subject to much discrimination. I feel separating these items into a “special section” is something that b...

Prompt Response 7

I think the most important thing to keep in mind is listed at the beginning of the class syllabus. Ranganathan's five laws are: 1. Books are for use 2. Every reader their book 3. Every book its reader 4. Save the time of the reader 5. The library is a growing organism Basically it doesn’t matter if some members of the public do not consider young adult or new adult “appropriate” reading choices for adults in general. We have a duty to see that every person’s reading choices are valued no matter how we may personally feel about the value of certain genres. I for one cannot stand Amish fiction or Christian fiction in general. Some other person may think romance has no place in the library, or another may think magazines don’t belong in a public library. It doesn’t matter how I or anyone else feels about the subject. A public library is for the public and we must try to serve every member of our public no matter how impossible it may seem. You can bet your bottom dollar I’m still goin...